Advertisement
I'm trying to learn about RDF by writing a FOAF extension in it.
This a quick question to any experts out there. Suppose I want to represent booleans. Should I use :
1)<myExtension:FlagName>True</myExtension:FlagName>
or should I use
2)
<myExtension:FlagName />
To represent that the boolean is true.
What if I want to represent a number of properties that may or may not occur for this person. Should I do them in style 1 or 2?
I've seen some documentation about bags and sequences as well. Are these used in FOAF-like apps?
cheers
phil
This a quick question to any experts out there. Suppose I want to represent booleans. Should I use :
1)<myExtension:FlagName>True</myExtension:FlagName>
or should I use
2)
<myExtension:FlagName />
To represent that the boolean is true.
What if I want to represent a number of properties that may or may not occur for this person. Should I do them in style 1 or 2?
I've seen some documentation about bags and sequences as well. Are these used in FOAF-like apps?
cheers
phil
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Wed, November 5, 2003 - 9:18 AMuse Danny Ayers for answer...... :-)
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Mon, November 10, 2003 - 12:03 AMA question is how is the property used? Boolean doesn't usually show up often in RDF things. Try to think of things in subject-predicate-object style and see what comes out.
For example, you've got <foaf:knows> right? Seems boolean. But it wraps around a <foaf:Person>. The RDF would be:
<foaf:Person rdf:id="foo">
<foaf:knows>
<foaf:Person rdf:id="bar">
<foaf:name>Joe Bar</foaf:name>
</foaf:Person>
</foaf:knows>
</foaf:Person>
which looks something like this in triples:
foo www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
foo xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows bar
bar www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
bar xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name Joe Bar
RDF really isn't something that lends it self to easy examples, 5 minute tutorials, or 3 day learning sprees, so I haven't really done it justice, but you might get something from this.
#foaf / #rdfig on irc.freenode.net is the best place to ask around for RDF advice. -
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Mon, November 10, 2003 - 4:43 AMThanks Eric.
Let me explain my problem a bit better. I'm interested in alternative money systems, and I'd like to add a "currency" extension to the FOAF person tag so that a person can describe which economic networks they're members of.
Now in my naive XML I'd write something like this (let's use AM as the namespace of my currency tags)
<foaf:person rdf:id="foo">
<AM:currency rdf:id="mydollar">
<AM:name>MyDollar</AM:name>
<AM:paynet url="paymentEnabler.com" />
<AM:mutualCredit />
<AM:demurrage />
%lt;/AM:currency>
etc.
where the demurrge and mutualCredit tags represent boolean flags. Either the currency has these properties or doesn't.
But I don't know if this is allowed. I suppose I could also write :
<AM:demurrage>True</AM:demurrage>
Which raises the question, if "demurrage" isn't true, do I also need to explicitly represent
<:AM:demurrage>False</AM:demurrage>
It seems this might be something which is free for my application to decide, that I can allow the absence of the tag to imply false. Or it might be something where RDF has an implicit interpretation eg. when a tag is missing it means "undefined". So I shouldn't be using it to imply false.
Any intuitions on this?
Cheers
phil -
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Tue, November 18, 2003 - 11:04 AMI'm not totally sure on this one, Phil, but I think you can use booleans are properties, attributes of entities. If I understand you, you are asking how do you interrogate these booleans and I'm not sure if you can set up a 'Horn clause'(IF,THEN...) in XML. -
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Tue, November 18, 2003 - 11:04 AM"as properties, attributes..."
-
-
Re: Booleans in RDF question ...
Sat, November 22, 2003 - 2:51 PMHello? It's almost two weeks since I asked this question and no-one has answered. :-(
Any intuitions anyone?
Thanks
-
-